The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) vs Sleeper One (electronic LA delivery system): Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition), Heft-Parker VAS 0-170 mm
- Population
- Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia
- Intervention
- The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system)
- Comparison
- Sleeper One (electronic LA delivery system)
- Outcome
- Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition), Heft-Parker VAS 0-170 mm
The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) showed no clear difference in pain on injection (self-reported; FACES Pain Scale Revised) compared with sleeper One (electronic LA delivery system); GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) vs Sleeper One (electronic LA delivery system) Pain on injection (self-reported; FACES Pain Scale Revised) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia · During LA (injection is the intervention) The wand (computer-controlled LA delivery system) showed no clear difference in pain on injection (self-reported; FACES Pain Scale Revised) compared with sleeper One (electronic LA delivery system); GRADE not reported. Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental… (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD 0.68 [-1.31, 2.67] | 1 study · 112 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-05 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.