Question · asked by 1 review

Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs No treatment (no periodontal treatment): Percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP)

Population
Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with or without hypertension
Intervention
Intensive periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment)
Comparison
No treatment (no periodontal treatment)
Outcome
Percentage of bleeding on probing (BOP)

Periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other… led to lower bleeding on probing (BOP) compared with no treatment (no periodontal treatment); GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other periodontal treatment) vs No treatment (no periodontal treatment)
Bleeding on probing (BOP) · Adults (any age/sex) with chronic periodontitis (>=5 teeth remaining; PPD >4 mm), with or without hypertension · Long term, People diagnosed with periodontitis and other cardiovascular diseases except hypertension
Periodontal treatment (subgingival SRP with or without other… led to lower bleeding on probing (BOP) compared with no treatment (no periodontal treatment); GRADE not reported.
Effect of periodontal treatments on blood pressure (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -36.80 [-46.47, -27.13]1 study · 48 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Effect of periodontal treatments on blood pressure
2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
2020-11Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.