Interleukin‐2 RA vs no induction: Acute rejection Acute rejection grade 3A or more verified by biopsy
Interleukin‐2 RA showed no clear difference in acute rejection Acute rejection grade 3A or more verified by biopsy compared with no induction (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Interleukin‐2 RA vs no induction Acute rejection Acute rejection grade 3A or more verified by biopsy · heart transplant recipients Interleukin‐2 RA showed no clear difference in acute rejection Acute rejection grade 3A or more verified by biopsy compared with no induction (low certainty). Immunosuppressive T‐cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.73 [0.46, 1.17] | 4 studies · 576 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunosuppressive T‐cell antibody induction for heart transplant recipients 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.