Question · asked by 1 review
Vitamin D vs placebo or no intervention: Serious adverse events
- Population
- people with chronic liver diseases
- Intervention
- Vitamin D
- Comparison
- placebo or no intervention
- Outcome
- Serious adverse events
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Vitamin D vs placebo or no intervention Serious adverse events · people with chronic liver diseases Vitamin D supplementation for chronic liver diseases in adults (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vitamin D supplementation for chronic liver diseases in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Vitamin D vs placebo · premenopausal women (age 18–32.7 years) · 1 review
- Vitamin D vs placebo or usual care · individuals with moderate to severe disease · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.