Fluoride in rinse vs no treatment: Caries increment in permanent teeth
The NMR reported a difference between fluoride in rinse and no treatment at every displayed randomisation year; no GRADE assessment was reported.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Fluoride in rinse vs No treatment Caries increment in permanent teeth · Children or adolescents · At least 1 year or school year, Randomisation year, NMR covariate The NMR reported a difference between fluoride in rinse and no treatment at every displayed randomisation year; no GRADE assessment was reported. Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. (2018) All outcomes | no estimate extracted | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Graphs of study contributions and covariate distributions for network meta-regression. 2018 All outcomes | Not specified | list not extracted yet | Not applicable |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.