Intensive counseling vs usual family planning care: Continuation of hormonal contraceptive method
It is very uncertain whether intensive counseling changes continuation of hormonal contraceptive method compared with usual family planning care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intensive counseling vs usual family planning care Continuation of hormonal contraceptive method · Women of reproductive age seeking to avoid pregnancy It is very uncertain whether intensive counseling changes continuation of hormonal contraceptive method compared with usual family planning care (very low certainty). Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter‐term hormonal methods of contraception (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 1.28 [1.07, 1.54] | 6 studies · 2624 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Strategies to improve adherence and continuation of shorter‐term hormonal methods of contraception 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.