Combined low‐dose OCP vs another combined low‐dose OCP: Adverse events for continuous vs standard regimen OCP
Combined low‐dose OCP may leads to higher adverse events for continuous vs standard regimen OCP compared with another combined low‐dose OCP (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Combined low‐dose OCP vs another combined low‐dose OCP Adverse events for continuous vs standard regimen OCP · women with primary dysmenorrhoea Combined low‐dose OCP may leads to higher adverse events for continuous vs standard regimen OCP compared with another combined low‐dose OCP (low certainty). Combined oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhoea (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.11 [1.01, 1.22] | 3 studies · 602 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combined oral contraceptive pill for primary dysmenorrhoea 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.