Question · asked by 1 review

Higher BMI (continuous / per-unit increment) vs Lower BMI (continuous reference / per 1 kg/m2 decrement): Dental caries in children

Population
Children (approx. 4-18 years)
Intervention
Higher BMI (continuous / per-unit increment)
Comparison
Lower BMI (continuous reference / per 1 kg/m2 decrement)
Outcome
Dental caries in children

Pooling studies that used BMI as a continuous variable showed no significant association between per-unit BMI and childhood dental caries (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.03; I2=3.5%); ungraded.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 3 · 100%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Higher BMI (continuous / per-unit increment) vs Lower BMI (continuous reference / per 1 kg/m2 decrement)
Dental caries in children · Children (approx. 4-18 years) · Dental examinations of children; 15 countries across Europe, Asia, the Americas and Oceania, Continuous BMI, direct pooling (studies reporting BMI as a continuous variable)
Pooling studies that used BMI as a continuous variable showed no significant association between per-unit BMI and childhood dental caries (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.03; I2=3.5%); ungraded.
Childhood obesity in relation to risk of dental caries: a cumulative and dose-response systematic review and… (2024) All outcomes
OR 1.01 [0.99, 1.03]4 studiesGRADE not reported
Higher BMI (continuous / per-unit increment) vs Lower BMI (continuous reference / per 1 kg/m2 decrement)
Dental caries in children · Children (approx. 4-18 years) · Dental examinations of children; 15 countries across Europe, Asia, the Americas and Oceania, Non-linear dose-response (restricted cubic splines)
A significant non-linear association was found between BMI and childhood dental caries, with higher risk at higher BMI and also among underweight children; ungraded (no single pooled estimate).
Childhood obesity in relation to risk of dental caries: a cumulative and dose-response systematic review and… (2024) All outcomes
Fig. 5: significant non-linear (restricted cubic spline) dose-response between BMI and childhood dental caries; relative risk rises at higher BMI (curve reaches ~2.4-2.9 at BMI 30-35) and is also elevated among…Not reportedGRADE not reported
Higher BMI (continuous / per-unit increment) vs Lower BMI (continuous reference / per 1 kg/m2 decrement)
Dental caries in children · Children (approx. 4-18 years) · Dental examinations of children; 15 countries across Europe, Asia, the Americas and Oceania, Linear dose-response (GLST, per 1 kg/m2 BMI increment)
A significant linear dose-response was reported between each 1 kg/m2 increment in BMI and childhood dental caries (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.03; I2=78.7%); ungraded.
Childhood obesity in relation to risk of dental caries: a cumulative and dose-response systematic review and… (2024) All outcomes
OR 1.01 [1.00, 1.03]16 studiesGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Childhood obesity in relation to risk of dental caries: a cumulative and dose-response systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
December 202324Not applicable

Studies behind the findings

The primary studies the full-text reviews tie to this outcome. Reviews with headline outcomes only do not list them here.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.