Question · asked by 1 review
1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement vs 2-stage (submerged) implant placement: Implant failure
- Population
- People with dental implants
- Intervention
- 1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement
- Comparison
- 2-stage (submerged) implant placement
- Outcome
- Implant failure
1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with 2-stage (submerged) implant placement (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement vs 2-stage (submerged) implant placement Implant failure · Any subject receiving osseointegrated dental implants · 6 to 12 months after loading 1-stage (non-submerged) implant placement showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with 2-stage (submerged) implant placement (moderate certainty). Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes | RR 1.39 [0.59, 3.27] | 4 studies · 230 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: 1- versus 2-stage implant placement 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2009-01 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.