Question · asked by 1 review

Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo: Clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction combined Comparable definitions; see Characteristics of included studies for exact definitions. Available‐case analysis

Dexrazoxane probably leads to lower clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction… compared with no cardioprotective intervention or placebo (moderate certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction combined Comparable definitions; see Characteristics of included studies for exact definitions. Available‐case analysis · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane probably leads to lower clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction… compared with no cardioprotective intervention or placebo (moderate certainty).
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.37 [0.24, 0.56]3 studies · 417 participantsModerate
Dexrazoxane vs no cardioprotective intervention or placebo
Clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction combined Comparable definitions; see Characteristics of included studies for exact definitions. Available‐case analysis · adults with cancer receiving anthracyclines
Dexrazoxane probably leads to lower clinical heart failure and subclinical myocardial dysfunction… compared with no cardioprotective intervention or placebo (moderate certainty).
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving… (2022) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.46 [0.33, 0.66]2 studies · 534 participantsModerate

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Dexrazoxane for preventing or reducing cardiotoxicity in adults and children with cancer receiving anthracyclines
2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.