Question · asked by 1 review

Fixed orthodontic treatment with fixed (multibracket) appliances (exposure) vs None (single-group prevalence/incidence estimate): Association between orthodontic treatment duration and ICLs prevalence

Population
Patients (permanent dentition) during or after fixed orthodontic treatment with fixed (multibracket) appliances
Intervention
Fixed orthodontic treatment with fixed (multibracket) appliances (exposure)
Comparison
None (single-group prevalence/incidence estimate)
Outcome
Association between orthodontic treatment duration and ICLs prevalence

ICLs prevalence increased with longer orthodontic treatment duration (meta-regression P=.01; ungraded).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fixed orthodontic treatment with fixed (multibracket) appliances (exposure) vs None (single-group prevalence/incidence estimate)
Association between orthodontic treatment duration and ICLs prevalence · Patients (permanent dentition) during or after fixed orthodontic treatment with fixed (multibracket) appliances · During or after fixed orthodontic treatment, International (16 countries; studies published 2005-2022); orthodontic clinical settings, By orthodontic treatment duration (subgroup meta-analysis; positive association, P=.01)
ICLs prevalence increased with longer orthodontic treatment duration (meta-regression P=.01; ungraded).
Distribution of initial caries lesions in relation to fixed orthodontic therapy. A systematic review and… (2024) All outcomes
Prevalence of ICLs positively associated with orthodontic treatment duration (meta-regression, P=.01); effect size/slope not available (Fig. 6a image not provided)Not reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Distribution of initial caries lesions in relation to fixed orthodontic therapy. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
2024 All outcomes
01 May 202333Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.