Question · asked by 1 review

Super ethoxybenzoic acid (Super-EBA) vs Intermediate restorative material (IRM): Success rate at 1 year

Population
Patients needing retrograde filling in root canal therapy (orthograde root canal filling or retreatment not possible; periapical surgery used to save the tooth); no age or gender limitations
Intervention
Super ethoxybenzoic acid (Super-EBA)
Comparison
Intermediate restorative material (IRM)
Outcome
Success rate at 1 year

It is very uncertain whether super ethoxybenzoic acid (Super-EBA) changes success rate at 1 year compared with intermediate restorative material (IRM) (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Super ethoxybenzoic acid (Super-EBA) vs Intermediate restorative material (IRM)
Success rate at 1 year · Patients needing retrograde filling in root canal therapy (orthograde root canal filling or retreatment not possible;… · 1 year
It is very uncertain whether super ethoxybenzoic acid (Super-EBA) changes success rate at 1 year compared with intermediate restorative material (IRM) (very low certainty).
Materials for retrograde filling in root canal therapy (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes
RR 0.90 [0.80, 1.01]1 studyVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Materials for retrograde filling in root canal therapy
2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-04Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.