Question · asked by 1 review
Metal-free FDPs (lithium disilicate) vs Metal-ceramic FDPs: Periodontal/peri-implant status and occlusal wear (secondary outcomes)
- Population
- Adults (18 years or older) needing a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP)
- Intervention
- Metal-free FDPs (lithium disilicate)
- Comparison
- Metal-ceramic FDPs
- Outcome
- Periodontal/peri-implant status and occlusal wear (secondary outcomes)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Metal-free FDPs (lithium disilicate) vs Metal-ceramic FDPs Periodontal/peri-implant status and occlusal wear (secondary outcomes) · Adults (18 years or older) needing a three-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations (2017) · Cochrane All outcomes | No data were presented for any of the pre-specified secondary outcomes. | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metal‐free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations 2017 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-05 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.