Question · asked by 1 review
Any orthodontic and/or surgical treatment for Angle Class III malocclusion vs no intervention or another intervention: Correction of prominent lower front teeth / effectiveness of treatment (planned primary outcome)
- Population
- Adults (16 years of age or older) with an Angle Class III malocclusion (prominent lower front teeth); people with syndromes, clefts or traumatically-induced deformities excluded
- Intervention
- Any orthodontic and/or surgical treatment for Angle Class III malocclusion
- Comparison
- no intervention or another intervention
- Outcome
- Correction of prominent lower front teeth / effectiveness of treatment (planned primary outcome)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Any orthodontic and/or surgical treatment for Angle Class III malocclusion vs No intervention or another treatment technique Correction of prominent lower front teeth / effectiveness of treatment (planned primary outcome) · Adults (16 years of age or older) with an Angle Class III malocclusion (prominent lower front teeth); people with… The review found no eligible studies for this question. Treatments for adults with prominent lower front teeth (2012) · Cochrane All outcomes | No included study measured the planned primary outcome. Discussion: 'The primary outcome proposed for this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments for prognathism, but none of the studies conclusively… | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments for adults with prominent lower front teeth 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2012-03 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.