Question · asked by 1 review

Basic wound contact dressing vs fibrous‐hydrocolloid dressing: SSI Assessment method: signs of infection (redness, tenderness, swelling or exudate)

It is very uncertain whether basic wound contact dressing changes SSI Assessment method: signs of infection (redness, tenderness,… compared with fibrous‐hydrocolloid dressing (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Basic wound contact dressing vs fibrous‐hydrocolloid dressing
SSI Assessment method: signs of infection (redness, tenderness, swelling or exudate) · surgical wounds resulting from clean surgery and healing by primary intention
It is very uncertain whether basic wound contact dressing changes SSI Assessment method: signs of infection (redness, tenderness,… compared with fibrous‐hydrocolloid dressing (very low certainty).
Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection (2016) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.29 [0.5, 3.28]3 studies · 364 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Dressings for the prevention of surgical site infection
2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.