Question · asked by 1 review
Oral steroids vs control: OME resolution at short‐term
- Population
- Children with otitis media with effusion
- Intervention
- Oral steroids
- Comparison
- control
- Outcome
- OME resolution at short‐term
Summary of findings: oral steroids showed no clear difference in OME resolution at short‐term compared with control (moderate certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: oral steroids vs control OME resolution at short‐term · Children with otitis media with effusion Summary of findings: oral steroids showed no clear difference in OME resolution at short‐term compared with control (moderate certainty). Oral or topical nasal steroids for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children (2011) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 3.8 [0.93, 15.52] | 3 studies · 108 participants | Moderate |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral or topical nasal steroids for hearing loss associated with otitis media with effusion in children 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.