Question · asked by 1 review

Nutrition education vs conventional management: Mean height‐for‐age z‐score

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Nutrition education vs conventional management
Height‐for‐age z score at 12 months of age (HAZ 12 months)Scale from 5 to ‐5 · term‐born infants in the first year of life
Education of family members to support weaning to solids and nutrition in later infancy in term‐born infants (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted7 studies · 3208 participantsModerate
Nutrition education vs conventional management
Height‐for‐age z score at 18 months of age (HAZ 18 months) · term‐born infants in the first year of life
Education of family members to support weaning to solids and nutrition in later infancy in term‐born infants (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted5 studies · 4813 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Education of family members to support weaning to solids and nutrition in later infancy in term‐born infants
2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.