Azoles vs moderate‐potent corticosteroid/azole combinations: Adverse effects Reported by investigators 'and' or 'or' participants
- Population
- patients with tinea cruris and tinea corporis
- Intervention
- Azoles
- Comparison
- moderate‐potent corticosteroid/azole combinations
- Outcome
- Adverse effects Reported by investigators 'and' or 'or' participants
It is very uncertain whether azoles changes adverse effects Reported by investigators 'and' or 'or' participants compared with moderate‐potent corticosteroid/azole combinations (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Azoles vs moderate‐potent corticosteroid/azole combinations Adverse effects Reported by investigators 'and' or 'or' participants · patients with tinea cruris and tinea corporis It is very uncertain whether azoles changes adverse effects Reported by investigators 'and' or 'or' participants compared with moderate‐potent corticosteroid/azole combinations (very low certainty). Topical antifungal treatments for tinea cruris and tinea corporis (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.36 [0.68, 2.69] | 5 studies · 668 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Topical antifungal treatments for tinea cruris and tinea corporis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Azoles vs benzylamines · patients with tinea cruris and tinea corporis · 1 review
- Azoles vs placebo · patients with tinea cruris and tinea corporis · 1 review
- Azoles vs allylamines · patients with tinea cruris and tinea corporis · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.