Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery vs phacoemulsification alone: Proportion of participants who required further glaucoma surgery, including laser
Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery showed no clear difference in proportion of participants who required further glaucoma surgeryat… compared with phacoemulsification alone (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery vs phacoemulsification alone Proportion of participants who required further glaucoma surgeryat 24 months (medium‐term) · people with open‐angle glaucoma Phacoemulsification + supraciliary microstent surgery showed no clear difference in proportion of participants who required further glaucoma surgeryat… compared with phacoemulsification alone (low certainty). Ab interno supraciliary microstent surgery for open‐angle glaucoma (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.26 [0.07, 1.04] | 1 study · 505 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ab interno supraciliary microstent surgery for open‐angle glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.