Question · asked by 1 review
Oral protein calorie supplements vs no intervention, placebo or additional nutritional advice compared to placebo: FEV1
- Population
- children with chronic disease
- Intervention
- Oral protein calorie supplements
- Comparison
- no intervention, placebo or additional nutritional advice compared to placebo
- Outcome
- FEV1
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Oral protein calorie supplements vs no intervention, placebo or additional nutritional advice compared to placebo Disease severity score: change in FEV1 % predicted at 12 months · children with chronic disease Oral protein calorie supplementation for children with chronic disease (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 70 participants | High |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral protein calorie supplementation for children with chronic disease 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.