Question · asked by 1 review

Lateral pararectal vs transrectal enterostomy placement: stomal prolapse clinical exam, documented on a standard pro forma

It is very uncertain whether lateral pararectal changes stomal prolapse clinical exam, documented on a standard pro forma compared with transrectal enterostomy placement (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Lateral pararectal vs transrectal enterostomy placement
stomal prolapse clinical exam, documented on a standard pro forma · people undergoing enterostomy placement for any reason
It is very uncertain whether lateral pararectal changes stomal prolapse clinical exam, documented on a standard pro forma compared with transrectal enterostomy placement (very low certainty).
Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation (2019) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.23 [0.39, 3.85]1 study · 145 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Lateral pararectal versus transrectal stoma placement for prevention of parastomal herniation
2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.