Manipulative therapy vs control condition: Presence/absence of colic Global impression of change scale completed by parents
Manipulative therapy showed no clear difference in presence/absence of colic Global impression of change scale… compared with control condition (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Manipulative therapy vs control condition Presence/absence of colic Global impression of change scale completed by parents · infants with colic Manipulative therapy showed no clear difference in presence/absence of colic Global impression of change scale… compared with control condition (low certainty). Manipulative therapies for infantile colic (2012) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | OR 11.12 [0.46, 267.52] | 3 studies · 185 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Manipulative therapies for infantile colic 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.