Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy: Occurrence of CIP/CIM ‐ in the total population randomised
Intensive insulin therapy may leads to lower occurrence of CIP/CIM ‐ in total population randomised compared with conventional insulin therapy (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Intensive insulin therapy vs conventional insulin therapy Occurrence of CIP/CIM ‐ in total population randomised · critically ill patients Intensive insulin therapy may leads to lower occurrence of CIP/CIM ‐ in total population randomised compared with conventional insulin therapy (low certainty). Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.7 [0.6, 0.82] | 2 studies · 2748 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for preventing critical illness polyneuropathy and critical illness myopathy 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.