Question · asked by 1 review
Early warning signs training and treatment as usual vs treatment: Adverse events: Lost to
- Population
- patients with schizophrenia
- Intervention
- Early warning signs training and treatment as usual
- Comparison
- treatment
- Outcome
- Adverse events: Lost to
It is very uncertain whether early warning signs training and treatment as usual changes adverse events: Lost to compared with treatment (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Early warning signs training and treatment as usual vs treatment Adverse events: Lost to · patients with schizophrenia It is very uncertain whether early warning signs training and treatment as usual changes adverse events: Lost to compared with treatment (very low certainty). Training to recognise the early signs of recurrence in schizophrenia (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.96 [0.72, 1.28] | 17 studies · 1495 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Training to recognise the early signs of recurrence in schizophrenia 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.