Question · asked by 1 review

Vaginal isosorbide mononitrate vs Foley catheter: Caesarean section

Population
pregnant women with 1 previous lower segment caesarean section at 37 weeks and beyond, with a BS of ≤ 6, intact membranes, reactive non‐stress test, normal umbilical arterial Doppler indices, absence of labour and willingness of women to participate in the study
Intervention
Vaginal isosorbide mononitrate
Comparison
Foley catheter
Outcome
Caesarean section

It is very uncertain whether vaginal isosorbide mononitrate changes caesarean section compared with foley catheter (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Vaginal isosorbide mononitrate vs Foley catheter
Caesarean section · pregnant women with 1 previous lower segment caesarean section at 37 weeks and beyond, with a BS of ≤ 6, intact…
It is very uncertain whether vaginal isosorbide mononitrate changes caesarean section compared with foley catheter (very low certainty).
Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.39, 2.59]1 study · 80 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Methods of term labour induction for women with a previous caesarean section
2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.