Question · asked by 1 review

Ruxolitinib vs best available therapy: Reduction in spleen size Magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography

Ruxolitinib may leads to higher reduction in spleen size Magnetic resonance imaging or computed… compared with best available therapy (low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Ruxolitinib vs best available therapy
Reduction in spleen size Magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography · Patients with treating MF
Ruxolitinib may leads to higher reduction in spleen size Magnetic resonance imaging or computed… compared with best available therapy (low certainty).
Janus kinase‐1 and Janus kinase‐2 inhibitors for treating myelofibrosis (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 41.78 [2.61, 669.75]1 study · 219 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Janus kinase‐1 and Janus kinase‐2 inhibitors for treating myelofibrosis
2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.