Question · asked by 1 review

Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing: Gingivitis

Population
Adults, 16 years and older (dentate)
Intervention
Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing
Comparison
Flossing plus toothbrushing
Outcome
Gingivitis

It is very uncertain whether oral irrigation plus toothbrushing changes gingivitis (gingival index) compared with flossing plus toothbrushing (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing
Gingivitis (gingival index) · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate) · 1 month
It is very uncertain whether oral irrigation plus toothbrushing changes gingivitis (gingival index) compared with flossing plus toothbrushing (very low certainty).
Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling… (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.06 [-0.12, 0.00]1 study · 63 participantsVery low
Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing vs Flossing plus toothbrushing
Gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites) · Adults, 16 years and older (dentate) · 1 month
Oral irrigation plus toothbrushing may leads to lower gingivitis (proportion of bleeding sites) compared with flossing plus toothbrushing (low certainty).
Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling… (2019) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -0.12 [-0.19, -0.05]2 studies · 133 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Home use of interdental cleaning devices, in addition to toothbrushing, for preventing and controlling periodontal diseases and dental…
2019 · Cochrane All outcomes
2019-01-16Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.