Question · asked by 1 review

Fixed bonded acrylic splint expander vs no treatment: Canine expansion

Population
Children and adults with a posterior crossbite, without a Class III skeletal relationship, cleft lip or palate (or both), or other syndrome associated with craniofacial anomalies (included studies were children and adolescents aged 5 to 17 years)
Intervention
Fixed bonded acrylic splint expander
Comparison
no treatment
Outcome
Canine expansion

Fixed bonded acrylic splint expander showed no clear difference in canine expansion (maxillary intercanine width) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Fixed bonded acrylic splint expander vs No treatment
Canine expansion (maxillary intercanine width) · Children and adults with a posterior crossbite, without a Class III skeletal relationship, cleft lip or palate (or…
Fixed bonded acrylic splint expander showed no clear difference in canine expansion (maxillary intercanine width) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD 2.2881 studyGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites
2021 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-04Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.