Voice‐enabling communication aid vs usual care with an aid: Proportion able to communicate
It is very uncertain whether voice‐enabling communication aid changes proportion able to communicate compared with usual care with an aid (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Voice‐enabling communication aid vs usual care with an aid Proportion able to communicate · adults requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support It is very uncertain whether voice‐enabling communication aid changes proportion able to communicate compared with usual care with an aid (very low certainty). Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 3.03 [0.18, 50.08] | 2 studies · 50 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions to enable communication for adult patients requiring an artificial airway with or without mechanical ventilator support 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.