Cognitive training combined with other neuropsychological rehabilitation methods vs control: Information processing speed
It is very uncertain whether cognitive training combined with other neuropsychological… changes information processing speed compared with any control (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Cognitive training combined with other neuropsychological rehabilitation methods vs any control Information processing speed · patients with multiple sclerosis It is very uncertain whether cognitive training combined with other neuropsychological… changes information processing speed compared with any control (very low certainty). Neuropsychological rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | SMD 0.05 | 3 studies · 181 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neuropsychological rehabilitation for multiple sclerosis 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.