Summary of findings ‐ structured telephone support or telemonitoring vs usual care ‐ all‐cause hospitalisation: Hospitalisation (any cause)
It is very uncertain whether summary of findings ‐ structured telephone support or telemonitoring changes all‐cause hospitalisation: Structured telephone support verus usual… compared with usual care ‐ all‐cause hospitalisation (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings ‐ structured telephone support or telemonitoring vs usual care ‐ all‐cause hospitalisation All‐cause hospitalisation: Structured telephone support verus usual care · people with heart failure It is very uncertain whether summary of findings ‐ structured telephone support or telemonitoring changes all‐cause hospitalisation: Structured telephone support verus usual… compared with usual care ‐ all‐cause hospitalisation (very low certainty). Structured telephone support or non‐invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.95 [0.9, 1] | 16 studies · 7216 participants | Very low |
Summary of findings ‐ structured telephone support or telemonitoring vs usual care ‐ all‐cause hospitalisation All‐cause hospitalisation: Telemonitoring versus usual care · people with heart failure It is very uncertain whether summary of findings ‐ structured telephone support or telemonitoring changes all‐cause hospitalisation: Telemonitoring versus usual care compared with usual care ‐ all‐cause hospitalisation (very low certainty). Structured telephone support or non‐invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.95 [0.89, 1.01] | 13 studies · 3332 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structured telephone support or non‐invasive telemonitoring for patients with heart failure 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.