Question · asked by 1 review

De‐escalation vs usual care: Physically aggressive behaviour (validated scale) Measured by: Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory ‐ Physically Aggressive Behaviour Scale (9 items rated on 7‐point scale, ranging from 1 (never occurs) to 7 (occurs several times an hour); lower sc...

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
De‐escalation vs standard care
Physically aggressive behaviour (validated scale) Measured by: Cohen‐Mansfield Agitation Inventory ‐ Physically Aggressive Behaviour Scale (9 items rated on 7‐point scale, ranging from 1 (never occurs) to 7 (occurs several times an hour); lower sc... · patients with dementia
De‐escalation techniques for managing non‐psychosis induced aggression in adults (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted1 study · 306 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
De‐escalation techniques for managing non‐psychosis induced aggression in adults
2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.