Question · asked by 1 review

CBT vs TAU: Quality of life (Higher scores indicate improvement)

Population
chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Intervention
CBT
Comparison
TAU
Outcome
Quality of life (Higher scores indicate improvement)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 50%High 0 · 0%
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
CBT vs TAU (at follow‐up)
Quality of life (Higher scores indicate improvement) · chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Psychological therapies delivered remotely for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted3 studies · 352 participantsModerate
CBT vs TAU (post‐treatment)
Quality of life (Higher scores indicate improvement) · chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
Psychological therapies delivered remotely for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults (2023) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted7 studies · 1423 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Psychological therapies delivered remotely for the management of chronic pain (excluding headache) in adults
2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedNot extractedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.