Question · asked by 1 review

Gemcitabine vs mitomycin: Grade III–V adverse events (local adverse events which result in delay intravesical treatment were regarded as Grade III–V complications)

It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine changes grade III–V adverse events (local adverse events which result in… compared with mitomycin (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Gemcitabine vs mitomycin
Grade III–V adverse events (local adverse events which result in delay intravesical treatment were regarded as Grade III–V complications) · participants with non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer1 (93 men, 16 women)Country: Italy
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine changes grade III–V adverse events (local adverse events which result in… compared with mitomycin (very low certainty).
Intravesical gemcitabine for non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.51 [0.13, 1.93]1 study · 109 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Intravesical gemcitabine for non‐muscle invasive bladder cancer
2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Not reportedlist not extracted yetNot assessed

Studies behind the findings

None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.