Question · asked by 1 review
Powered toothbrush, side-to-side action vs Rotation oscillation powered toothbrush: Adverse events
- Population
- Individuals of any age with no reported disability that might affect toothbrushing (including people wearing orthodontic appliances)
- Intervention
- Powered toothbrush, side-to-side action
- Comparison
- Rotation oscillation powered toothbrush
- Outcome
- Adverse events
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Side to side action powered toothbrush vs Rotation oscillation powered toothbrush Adverse events · People of any age with no reported disability affecting their ability to practise normal self-toothbrushing;… Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health (2010) · Cochrane All outcomes | Grossman 1995 reported some discomfort with use of one mode of action brush; Hefti 2000 reported no difference in dentine hypersensitivity. | 2 studies | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Different powered toothbrushes for plaque control and gingival health 2010 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2010-07 | Not listed | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Powered toothbrush, side-to-side action vs Counter oscillation powered toothbrush · Individuals of any age with no reported disability that might affect toothbrushing… · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.