Question · asked by 1 review
38% SDF (every 6 months) vs no treatment: new active or inactive carious lesions
- Population
- Children with dental caries in permanent (first) molars
- Intervention
- 38% SDF (every 6 months)
- Comparison
- no treatment
- Outcome
- new active or inactive carious lesions
SDF had a 72% preventative fraction; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating was reported.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
38% SDF every 6 months vs no treatment new active or inactive carious lesions · schoolchildren with caries in permanent first molars · 36 months, Santiago de Cuba Cuba SDF had a 72% preventative fraction; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating was reported. A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent… (2023) All outcomes | Preventative fraction (%) 72 | 1 study · 452 participants | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| A systematic review on the effect of silver diamine fluoride for management of dental caries in permanent teeth. 2023 All outcomes | December 2022 | 13 | Low / Critically Low |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.