Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings: multimedia education vs written education: Quality of life ‐ not measured
- Population
- patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers
- Intervention
- Summary of findings: multimedia education
- Comparison
- written education
- Outcome
- Quality of life ‐ not measured
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: multimedia education vs written education Quality of life ‐ not measured · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers The review found no eligible studies for this question. Multimedia educational interventions for consumers about prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications (2013) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Multimedia educational interventions for consumers about prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Summary of findings: multimedia education vs education by a health professional · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers · 1 review
- Summary of findings: multimedia education vs no education or usual care · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers · 1 review
- Summary of findings: multimedia education vs written education and education by a health professional · patients taking prescribed and over‐the‐counter medications or their carers · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.