External control of fluoride concentration vs Not applicable: Water samples with fluoride concentration above the acceptable range
In the Northeast region, 0.2% of samples were above the acceptable range.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
External control of fluoride concentration vs Not applicable Samples with fluoride concentration above the acceptable range · Brazilian cities in the Northeast region with artificially fluoridated public water supplies · 1995-2013, Brazilian Northeast, Northeast region In the Northeast region, 0.2% of samples were above the acceptable range. External control of fluoridation in the public water supplies of Brazilian cities as a strategy against… (2021) All outcomes | Prevalence 0.2 | Not reported | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| External control of fluoridation in the public water supplies of Brazilian cities as a strategy against caries: a systematic review and… 2021 All outcomes | Until 10 August 2020 | 20 | Not applicable |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.