Question · asked by 1 review

Access to dental care / health services vs No / limited access to dental care: Oral health-related quality of life

Population
Adolescents (10-19 years)
Intervention
Access to dental care / health services
Comparison
No / limited access to dental care
Outcome
Oral health-related quality of life

Access to dental care is associated with better OHRQoL in adolescents (narrative synthesis; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Access to dental care / health services vs No / limited access to dental care
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) · Adolescents (10-19 years) · Community/school/clinic settings; adolescents 10-19 years; included reviews conducted in multiple countries
Access to dental care is associated with better OHRQoL in adolescents (narrative synthesis; no pooled estimate or GRADE rating).
Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review. (2023) All outcomes
having parents who can provide dental care and safe housing are positive predictors for OHRQoL. access to dental care and the performance of health promotion programs are directly proportional to OHRQoL in adolescents.Not reportedGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Oral-health-related quality of life in adolescents: umbrella review.
2023 All outcomes
January 202222Not applicable
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.