Question · asked by 1 review
Telemedicine vs usual care: Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
- Population
- women with gestational diabetes mellitus
- Intervention
- Telemedicine
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
It is very uncertain whether telemedicine changes hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including pre‐eclampsia,… compared with standard care (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Telemedicine vs standard care Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including pre‐eclampsia, gestational hypertension and eclampsia · women with gestational diabetes mellitus It is very uncertain whether telemedicine changes hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including pre‐eclampsia,… compared with standard care (very low certainty). Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy (2017) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.49 [0.69, 3.2] | 4 studies · 275 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Different methods and settings for glucose monitoring for gestational diabetes during pregnancy 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.