Question · asked by 1 review
Total shunt vs endoscopic intervention: Health‐related quality of life
- Population
- participants with cirrhosis and with previous oesophagogastric variceal bleeding
- Intervention
- Total shunt
- Comparison
- endoscopic intervention
- Outcome
- Health‐related quality of life
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Total shunt vs endoscopic intervention Health‐related quality of life · participants with cirrhosis and with previous oesophagogastric variceal bleeding The review found no eligible studies for this question. Portosystemic shunts versus endoscopic intervention with or without medical treatment for prevention of… (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Portosystemic shunts versus endoscopic intervention with or without medical treatment for prevention of rebleeding in people with cirrhosis 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.