Some components of shared decision‐making, including clarification of values and preferences, vs control: Mental health outcomes
Some components of shared decision‐making, including clarification… showed no clear difference in mental health outcomes compared with control (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Some components of shared decision‐making, including clarification of values and preferences, vs control Mental health outcomes · women aged 38 to 71 years at average to moderate risk of breast cancer Some components of shared decision‐making, including clarification… showed no clear difference in mental health outcomes compared with control (low certainty). Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | MD 0.54 | 2 studies · 749 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shared decision‐making for supporting women’s decisions about breast cancer screening 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.