Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings: feedback on medication adherence to physicians vs usual care: Adherence
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings: feedback on medication adherence to physicians vs usual care Medication adherence Percentage of 'days covered' by medication (medication possession ratio), percentage of 'time covered', percentage of non‐adherent patients, 'time‐to‐refill' (i.e. the number of days between the date where the patient was decl... · any physician, and any patient treated for chronic diseases with long‐term medication use Providing physicians with feedback on medication adherence for people with chronic diseases taking long‐term… (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Providing physicians with feedback on medication adherence for people with chronic diseases taking long‐term medication 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.