Question · asked by 1 review

Autopolymerised sealant vs Light polymerised sealant: Development of >=1 new carious lesion (caries incidence)

Population
Children with sound primary molars, aged 2-4 years (municipal dental clinics or hospital paediatric clinics, Denmark)
Intervention
Autopolymerised sealant
Comparison
Light polymerised sealant
Outcome
Development of >=1 new carious lesion (caries incidence)

It is very uncertain whether autopolymerised sealant changes development of >=1 new carious lesion (caries incidence) compared with light polymerised sealant (very low certainty).

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Autopolymerised sealant vs Light polymerised sealant
Development of >=1 new carious lesion (caries incidence) · Children with sound primary molars, aged 2-4 years (municipal dental clinics or hospital paediatric clinics, Denmark) · 24-36 months
It is very uncertain whether autopolymerised sealant changes development of >=1 new carious lesion (caries incidence) compared with light polymerised sealant (very low certainty).
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth (2022) · Cochrane All outcomes
OR 0.58 [0.15, 2.19]1 study · 52 participantsVery low

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Sealants for preventing dental caries in primary teeth
2022 · Cochrane All outcomes
2021-02Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.