Question · asked by 1 review
Audiovisual distraction vs Conventional treatment: Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition), Heft-Parker VAS 0-170 mm
- Population
- Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia
- Intervention
- Audiovisual distraction
- Comparison
- Conventional treatment
- Outcome
- Adverse effects: pain on injection (solution deposition), Heft-Parker VAS 0-170 mm
Audiovisual distraction showed no clear difference in pain on injection (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, after… compared with conventional treatment; GRADE not reported.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Audiovisual distraction vs Conventional treatment Pain on injection (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, after inferior alveolar block) · Children and adolescents having dental treatment under local anaesthetic without general anaesthesia · During LA, VR box vs conventional Audiovisual distraction showed no clear difference in pain on injection (Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale, after… compared with conventional treatment; GRADE not reported. Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental… (2020) · Cochrane All outcomes | MD 0.04 [-0.41, 0.48] | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for increasing acceptance of local anaesthetic in children and adolescents having dental treatment 2020 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2019-05 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.