Extraction of the primary (baby) canine (single primary tooth extraction) vs No extraction (non-intervention control): Overall treatment time wearing orthodontic appliances
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Extraction of the primary (baby) canine (single primary tooth extraction) vs No extraction (non-intervention control) Overall treatment time wearing orthodontic appliances · Young people aged 9 to 14 years diagnosed with one or both palatally displaced permanent maxillary canines (PDC) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for… (2021) · Cochrane All outcomes | no estimate extracted | 0 studies | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for promoting the eruption of palatally displaced permanent canine teeth, without the need for surgical exposure, in… 2021 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2021-02 | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.