An extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14 weeks vs an extended NVP regimen administered to infants: Infants with Probably Related Severe Adverse Events
- Population
- Breastfeeding infants of HIV‐infected mothers
- Intervention
- An extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14 weeks
- Comparison
- an extended NVP regimen administered to infants
- Outcome
- Infants with Probably Related Severe Adverse Events
It is very uncertain whether an extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14… changes infants with Probably Related Severe Adverse Events compared with an extended NVP regimen administered to infants (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
An extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14 weeks vs an extended NVP regimen administered to infants Infants with Probably Related Severe Adverse Events · Breastfeeding infants of HIV‐infected mothers1 It is very uncertain whether an extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14… changes infants with Probably Related Severe Adverse Events compared with an extended NVP regimen administered to infants (very low certainty). Antiretroviral interventions for preventing breast milk transmission of HIV (2014) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.02 [0.33, 3.15] | 1 study · 2013 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Antiretroviral interventions for preventing breast milk transmission of HIV 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- An extended NVP plus ZDV dual regimen administered to infants for 14 weeks vs sdNVP plus ZDV (1 week) · Breastfeeding infants of HIV‐infected mothers · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.