Question · asked by 1 review
Virtual reality temporal bone dissection training vs cadaveric temporal bone dissection training: End‐product score Modified Welling scale
- Population
- surgical trainees
- Intervention
- Virtual reality temporal bone dissection training
- Comparison
- cadaveric temporal bone dissection training
- Outcome
- End‐product score Modified Welling scale
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Virtual reality temporal bone dissection training vs cadaveric temporal bone dissection training End‐product score Welling scale Scale from: 0 to 3.5 · surgical trainees Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 65 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
Related questions
The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.
- Virtual reality temporal bone dissection training vs conventional training · medical students · 1 review
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.