Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted: Early graft loss ‐ not reported
- Population
- live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
- Intervention
- Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic
- Comparison
- hand‐assisted
- Outcome
- Early graft loss ‐ not reported
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted Early graft loss ‐ not reported · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes) The review found no eligible studies for this question. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.