Question · asked by 1 review
Routine/revealed vs selective/concealed ultrasound: Induction of labour for post‐maturity
- Population
- Fetal ultrasound assessment before 24 weeks' gestation
- Intervention
- Routine/revealed
- Comparison
- selective/concealed ultrasound
- Outcome
- Induction of labour for post‐maturity
Routine/revealed may leads to lower induction of labour for 'post‐term' pregnancy compared with selective/concealed ultrasound (low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Routine/revealed vs selective/concealed ultrasound Induction of labour for 'post‐term' pregnancy · Pregnant women at less than 24 weeks' gestation undergoing fetal assessment by ultrasound Routine/revealed may leads to lower induction of labour for 'post‐term' pregnancy compared with selective/concealed ultrasound (low certainty). Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy (2015) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.59 [0.42, 0.83] | 8 studies · 25516 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.